首页> 外文OA文献 >Relativism or Anti-Anti-Relativism? Epistemological and Rhetorical Moves in Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science
【2h】

Relativism or Anti-Anti-Relativism? Epistemological and Rhetorical Moves in Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science

机译:相对主义还是反相对主义?女性主义认识论和科学哲学中的认识论和修辞动作

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Feminist approaches in epistemology and philosophy of science have frequently been labelled as ’relativist’, both by feminist as well as by non-feminist philosophers. Regularly the so labelled distance themselves from even the mere suspicion of relativist tendencies. There is a remarkable discrepancy between an attributed and a self-declared relativism. Taking the self-declared relativism of Lorraine Code as an example, the article argues that it is a case of a rhetorical not epistemological relativism, better termed as anti-anti-relativism, but that there are nevertheless good reasons for feminists to follow Code along that path.
机译:在认识论和科学哲学中,女性主义方法经常被女性主义和非女性主义哲学家称为“相对主义者”。通常,如此贴上标签的标签甚至与仅仅怀疑相对主义倾向的人保持距离。归因的和自我宣称的相对主义之间存在明显的差异。以《洛林法典》自称的相对主义为例,文章认为这是一种修辞学而不是认识论的相对主义,被更好地称为反反相对主义,但是,女权主义者仍然有充分的理由遵循《法典》那条路。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hönig, Kathrin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号